I don't mind Lieberman caucusing where he wants. He could caucus with himself as far as I'm concerned. It's the chairmanship thing that needs to go. Perhaps one goes with the other and I'm not quite understanding the Byzantine culture of the Senate properly. Nichols is usually pretty good so I'd give his advice serious consideration. My concern with this strategy would be that Lieberman would have even more power to jerk the Democrats around. (My emphasis added in the section noted below.)
I doubt Martin will win. Begich and Franken are in better shape from what I've been reading (especially on Politico). I wonder what he's reading to think otherwise. Also Nichols' historic examples, while interesting, don't really apply here, imo. This also assumes the the Republicans will go out of their way to block every bill on a 100% partisan basis. After the butt kicking they just took, and the bad re-election numbers they see coming up in a short two years, that may be the way to a complete power loss.
Some things aren't worth the price you have to pay. Keeping consistently selfish and disloyal people around you is one of them. You're just asking for big time headaches down the line.
Keep Lieberman in the Caucus (For Now) - John Nichols - The Nation - 12 Nov 08
"My sense is that Democrats would be wiser to keep Lieberman in the Democratic circle for so long as he sides with the caucus on cloture votes. After all, if Al Franken prevails in the Minnesota recount and Jim Martin wins the Georgia run-off -- both serious prospects -- a Democratic caucus that includes Lieberman will have 59 Senate seats. And if Alaska's Nick Begich comes from behind as that state counts the last of its ballots -- a more remote prospect -- a Democratic caucus that includes Lieberman will have the 60 seats needed to block a Republican filibuster."
I doubt Martin will win. Begich and Franken are in better shape from what I've been reading (especially on Politico). I wonder what he's reading to think otherwise. Also Nichols' historic examples, while interesting, don't really apply here, imo. This also assumes the the Republicans will go out of their way to block every bill on a 100% partisan basis. After the butt kicking they just took, and the bad re-election numbers they see coming up in a short two years, that may be the way to a complete power loss.
Some things aren't worth the price you have to pay. Keeping consistently selfish and disloyal people around you is one of them. You're just asking for big time headaches down the line.
Keep Lieberman in the Caucus (For Now) - John Nichols - The Nation - 12 Nov 08
"My sense is that Democrats would be wiser to keep Lieberman in the Democratic circle for so long as he sides with the caucus on cloture votes. After all, if Al Franken prevails in the Minnesota recount and Jim Martin wins the Georgia run-off -- both serious prospects -- a Democratic caucus that includes Lieberman will have 59 Senate seats. And if Alaska's Nick Begich comes from behind as that state counts the last of its ballots -- a more remote prospect -- a Democratic caucus that includes Lieberman will have the 60 seats needed to block a Republican filibuster."