More on the India-USA Nuclear Deal
Aug. 13th, 2008 12:05 amToday was one of those fairly rare days when I read the local newspaper. Nothing like recycling a paper at the local coffeehouse.
One of the columnists they have in the Journal-Star is Gwynne Dyer who typically provides an international war-and-peace perspective. This latest column fills in a few blanks on the recent infamous, imo, India-USA nuclear agreement (aka Henry J. Hyde United States-India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation Act of 2006). It's a great over view of nuclear proliferation issues along with other related tidbits. The intro section below.
India's House of Cards is Still Tottering Precariously - Kings County Record - 12 Aug 08
"Three weeks ago, the Indian government did everything but raise the dead to win a crucial vote on its nuclear deal with the United States. Jailed members of parliament were given temporary release in order to vote, MPs in intensive care were wheeled into the chamber, and there was talk of multi-million dollar bribes being offered for MPs to change their votes.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh won, in the end, but the nuclear house of cards he has built over the past few years is still tottering. The nuclear deal got past the International Atomic Energy Agency a week ago, but it faces a stormier passage when it goes before the Nuclear Suppliers Group later this month. Indeed, NSG members that hate the deal but don't want to anger New Delhi can kill it just by stalling for a little while.
President George W. Bush must send the completed deal, approved by the IAEA and the NSG, to the US Congress before early September, or it is effectively dead. Congress must have the bill for thirty days before it can vote on it. It is currently scheduled to adjourn in late September and if the favoured candidate in the presidential election, Barack Obama, wins the November vote, the deal will not be resurrected after he takes office.
How do we know that? Because Obama really doesn't like nuclear weapons. Late last year, he rashly promised that he would never use nuclear weapons against civilians. Then, when he was criticized for that 'gaffe' who ever heard of a president who wasn't willing to kill civilians? he went flat out and said that the United States should seek 'a world in which there are no nuclear weapons.' Not even American ones."
One of the columnists they have in the Journal-Star is Gwynne Dyer who typically provides an international war-and-peace perspective. This latest column fills in a few blanks on the recent infamous, imo, India-USA nuclear agreement (aka Henry J. Hyde United States-India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation Act of 2006). It's a great over view of nuclear proliferation issues along with other related tidbits. The intro section below.
India's House of Cards is Still Tottering Precariously - Kings County Record - 12 Aug 08
"Three weeks ago, the Indian government did everything but raise the dead to win a crucial vote on its nuclear deal with the United States. Jailed members of parliament were given temporary release in order to vote, MPs in intensive care were wheeled into the chamber, and there was talk of multi-million dollar bribes being offered for MPs to change their votes.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh won, in the end, but the nuclear house of cards he has built over the past few years is still tottering. The nuclear deal got past the International Atomic Energy Agency a week ago, but it faces a stormier passage when it goes before the Nuclear Suppliers Group later this month. Indeed, NSG members that hate the deal but don't want to anger New Delhi can kill it just by stalling for a little while.
President George W. Bush must send the completed deal, approved by the IAEA and the NSG, to the US Congress before early September, or it is effectively dead. Congress must have the bill for thirty days before it can vote on it. It is currently scheduled to adjourn in late September and if the favoured candidate in the presidential election, Barack Obama, wins the November vote, the deal will not be resurrected after he takes office.
How do we know that? Because Obama really doesn't like nuclear weapons. Late last year, he rashly promised that he would never use nuclear weapons against civilians. Then, when he was criticized for that 'gaffe' who ever heard of a president who wasn't willing to kill civilians? he went flat out and said that the United States should seek 'a world in which there are no nuclear weapons.' Not even American ones."