Apr. 23rd, 2008

webfarmer: (Default)
It's not like the native folks haven't suffered enough. Now this. (Even if well meaning.)

Just say no to concentrators or, in this case, diffusers on wind turbines. Dr. Heiner Dörner hits the nail on the head with this presentation, "HAWT contra VAWT". Check out the two images [1] [2] in particular for comparisons between various wind turbine concepts. The weight usually translates directly into costs and there's a very large difference on that level alone for equivalent outputs.

Fellow wind energy graybeard, Paul Gipe, had some choice things to note about an earlier (but larger) diffusion augmentation turbine called the Vortec. At least it looked kind of cool. :)

Frankly, correctly mounting some marine batteries and inverter in the back of the old pickup truck, charging them as one drives around doing errands and then running a proper line into the house might be a better approach in terms of economics, if not environment. Otherwise, building copies of Hugh Piggott's proven homebuilt design would make more sense from a wind system standpoint.

Device Turns Wind Into Home Energy - New Mexico Business Weekly - 11 Apr 08

"The generator is a tube-shaped device that sits on a tripod. It's just 22 inches long and 7.5 inches in diameter." " ""Baca's unit produces about 300 miliwatts of power now, which is pretty small,' Blose said. 'We need to scale it up enough to produce one to two kilowatts.' Ktech will analyze design changes, scale up the prototype, and then assess durability in severe weather. All that could take 18-20 months and up to $1.5 million, Blose said. "
webfarmer: (Default)
It's not like the native folks haven't suffered enough. Now this. (Even if well meaning.)

Just say no to concentrators or, in this case, diffusers on wind turbines. Dr. Heiner Dörner hits the nail on the head with this presentation, "HAWT contra VAWT". Check out the two images [1] [2] in particular for comparisons between various wind turbine concepts. The weight usually translates directly into costs and there's a very large difference on that level alone for equivalent outputs.

Fellow wind energy graybeard, Paul Gipe, had some choice things to note about an earlier (but larger) diffusion augmentation turbine called the Vortec. At least it looked kind of cool. :)

Frankly, correctly mounting some marine batteries and inverter in the back of the old pickup truck, charging them as one drives around doing errands and then running a proper line into the house might be a better approach in terms of economics, if not environment. Otherwise, building copies of Hugh Piggott's proven homebuilt design would make more sense from a wind system standpoint.

Device Turns Wind Into Home Energy - New Mexico Business Weekly - 11 Apr 08

"The generator is a tube-shaped device that sits on a tripod. It's just 22 inches long and 7.5 inches in diameter." " ""Baca's unit produces about 300 miliwatts of power now, which is pretty small,' Blose said. 'We need to scale it up enough to produce one to two kilowatts.' Ktech will analyze design changes, scale up the prototype, and then assess durability in severe weather. All that could take 18-20 months and up to $1.5 million, Blose said. "
webfarmer: (Default)
So let's say that Obama wins but is so damaged by Clinton's attacks that he loses to McCain.

Does the hate fest that was unleashed on Nader for causing Gore to lose (supposedly) now get directed to Hillary for single-handedly destroying Obama's prospects after it was clear she couldn't win?

The National Organization for Women (NOW) president, Kim Gandy, on Democracy Now! today made me sick by her comments on how Hillary wasn't being negative and that in fact it was Obama who was the mud slinger. She also notes Hillary was always anti-NAFTA. [explicative deleted]

What's sad for me is that it seems that Obama's campaign apparently has decided to take the bait and join the battle on that level. I don't think he can do that without seriously damaging his brand. Maybe being out of demographically unfriendly Pennsylvania will have them re-evaluating that decision.
webfarmer: (Default)
So let's say that Obama wins but is so damaged by Clinton's attacks that he loses to McCain.

Does the hate fest that was unleashed on Nader for causing Gore to lose (supposedly) now get directed to Hillary for single-handedly destroying Obama's prospects after it was clear she couldn't win?

The National Organization for Women (NOW) president, Kim Gandy, on Democracy Now! today made me sick by her comments on how Hillary wasn't being negative and that in fact it was Obama who was the mud slinger. She also notes Hillary was always anti-NAFTA. [explicative deleted]

What's sad for me is that it seems that Obama's campaign apparently has decided to take the bait and join the battle on that level. I don't think he can do that without seriously damaging his brand. Maybe being out of demographically unfriendly Pennsylvania will have them re-evaluating that decision.

Profile

webfarmer: (Default)
webfarmer

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 24th, 2025 09:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios